Pondering: On Art and the ‘morbid crisis of a neurotic nature’
January 8th, 2012 by sissT
Crisis is all too familiar to me; there is this exhibition, this deadline, there are sleepless nights, oh-shit-oh-shit-I-just-can-not-do-this-f***-F*** etc… Getting older, you ask yourself, why does this happen every time? It’s just stupid. A waste of time. Could I, PLEASE, just get on with it! In the end all-is-well-that-ends-well. Some stuff goes on the wall; other stuff find its place in the bin.
So it is not surprising, that this quote caught my attention, even hidden in a footnote, during my research on story telling and creative writing.
“This explains why hardly any productive work gets through without morbid crises of a neurotic nature.”
I am reading The Hero with a Thousand Faces, by Joseph Campbell*; I often find myself more interested in the comprehensive footnotes and quotes, than in the actual text. You’ll find this footnote in Part 1, Chapter 1, under the title ’2. Refusal of the Call’, where Campbell quotes Otto Rank** (1884 – 1939) from Art and the Artist, published in New York 1943.
To distinguish the ‘neurotic’ from the ‘productive’ artist Rank writes: ”…both are distinguished fundamentally from the average type, who accepts himself as he is, by their tendency to exercise their violation in reshaping themselves.” He states the neurotic type does “…not get beyond the destructive preliminary work and is therefore unable to detach the whole creative process from his own person and [unable to] transfer it to an ideological abstraction. The productive artist also begins… with that re-creation of himself … [but] is in a position to shift the creative will-power from his own person to an ideological representations of that person and thus render it objective.”Rank emphasises that even the productive artistic process is “in a measure limited … to within the individual himself… in its constructive, but also in its destructive aspects.” He ends with the quoto above, “This explains why hardly any productive work gets through without morbid crises of a neurotic nature.”
In short: The ‘artist’ is captured in the need to re-invent himself, or his surroundings. In a productive phase, he is able to shift this creative power from himself to his artwork. So the artistic process, if it does not begin in crisis, will go through crisis, or even end in a crisis (failure).
This might explain a lot ^_^…
————————-
* and desperately trying to ignore hero-worshipping references to Freudian psychoanalytic simplifications that make me very, very angry…
** again you have to see them in their historic context. That we have outgrown some (most?) of their ideas, does not mean they do not have something to say.
Add your Feedback (0)
^_^...









